The followership is very interesting. For certain dynamics those "Rules," or "leadership ethics" could assist and benefit an enterprises operation system (Including the Air Force). Of the 10 rules,"
I particularly like 6. Do your homework; give your boss all the information needed to make a decision; and 9.If you see a problem, fix it.I would be concerned that this could catalyst a corruptive bureaucracy. The point is that as long as the operations the followers are following is already efficient, then Colonel Phillip Meilinger's 10 rules system sustains the integrity brilliantly.
Personally I would administer a control mechanism of quality that would have a core respect to bio-ethics, (Some sort of egalitarian visualization) could be fused into following a philosophy that conforms to virtues, and not radicalism. Just to clarify; I simply mean fundemendalistic, unefficient, unconservative, and unethical philosophical tactics when I said radicalism.